On 25-3-2009 22:48, Jim Henderson wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Mar 2009 09:26:37 -0700, Darren New wrote:
> 
> In order to get through the vetting process, both sides would have to 
> think they had strong enough evidence to convince the expert they were 
> correct.  That's going to be a pretty rare occurrence - and you can't 
> really get to know someone's full depth of experience during voir dire, 
> either - it's not a long process.

That seems to imply that it is important information that either side 
rejected someone who might be an expert. So I assume this is information 
that is not passed on to the final jury.

Post a reply to this message