|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
On 25-3-2009 22:48, Jim Henderson wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Mar 2009 09:26:37 -0700, Darren New wrote:
>
> In order to get through the vetting process, both sides would have to
> think they had strong enough evidence to convince the expert they were
> correct. That's going to be a pretty rare occurrence - and you can't
> really get to know someone's full depth of experience during voir dire,
> either - it's not a long process.
That seems to imply that it is important information that either side
rejected someone who might be an expert. So I assume this is information
that is not passed on to the final jury.
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |