On 18-3-2009 2:19, Chambers wrote:
> On 3/17/2009 2:22 PM, andrel wrote:
>> Next legal problem: we now know that we have probably a criminal amongst
>> us
> 
> Pick your battles.  Do you know how many people come through our 
> drive-through window, and present as identification an ID card instead 
> of a driver's license?
> 
> It's not worth going further with it.
> 
I agree, I don't see any reason to act for any of us ATM. It was just a 
way to express that there may be other side effects as well if you tell 
a group of people something like this. Things may e.g. change when in a 
couple of years time someone meets him in person.
Shall we just forget this incident and then in a couple of weeks time 
when p.o-t expires we can just pretend this never happened?

Post a reply to this message