|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
On 13-3-2009 11:27, Invisible wrote:
>>>> Why not in (reverse) polish, no brackets at all
>>>
>>> If you think *you* can find a suitable encoding for lambda
>>> expressions in reverse polish notation, be my freakin' guest! :-P
>>
>> I'd say that polish would be enormously more simple than standard infix.
>
> Not once you add case expressions, let expressions, type signatures and
> so forth.
The numerical expressions (which is what your question was about) would
still be more simple and there is no rule that other expressions can not
be implemented in another convenient way.
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |