|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Invisible wrote:
> Even so, 10x higher still seems rather large. I would have expected
> something more like a few percent denser.
http://www.dayah.com/periodic/
If anything, it should be closer to a factor of 15 than of 10.
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
"Ouch ouch ouch!"
"What's wrong? Noodles too hot?"
"No, I have Chopstick Tunnel Syndrome."
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |