|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Invisible wrote:
> As I understand it, this is considered one of the "seminal texts" on
> relational databases.
It was some 25 years ago too. :-)
> Even I cannot comprehend the relational calculus though. Relational
> algebra, sure. But relational calculus? Nah.
Same here. I understand that SQL itself is much closer to the relational
calculus than the relation algebra. I'd have to go back and try to read it
again, tho.
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
"Ouch ouch ouch!"
"What's wrong? Noodles too hot?"
"No, I have Chopstick Tunnel Syndrome."
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |