On 20-2-2009 12:32, Invisible wrote:
>>> I should probably get back to rectifying the IT-related deficiencies 
>>> now... Possibly using a diode bridge. ;-)
>>
>> How many of those were you aware of, but were prevented from changing?
> 
> Only 3, really. (There's about 10 IT-related deficiencies reported.)

Three is not bad.

> I don't know if you've ever experienced this, but, see, auditors have 
> this magical ability. No matter how properly you think you're doing 
> something, some auditor will *always* come up with "why didn't you do 
> X?" And you think to yourself "hey, actually... yeah, we probablt should 
> have. Crap. I never thought of that."
> 
> Also, if there's one instance where a procedure wasn't followed, the one 
> case that the auditors randomly select will be *that one*. And they will 
> then refuse to believe you that the thousands of other cases just like 
> it were carried out correctly and tha this is an isolated incident.
> 
> Auditors are scary. ._.

It is called experience.

Post a reply to this message