|
|
Orchid XP v8 escreveu:
>> Haskell doesn't suck. It sucks a lot less than C++, certainly. Being
>> slower doesn't mean it sucks. The higher-level the language and more
>> away from the underlying low-level metal, the better. Haskell sucks a
>> lot less performance-wise than most other very high-level languages.
>
> Faster than Java, C#, F#, Erlang, Clean, Lisp... But still not quite as
> fast as C.
Nothing is faster than C, some wise men said. ;)
> And let's face it, millions of people can program in C. Why bother
> learning Haskell?
Oh, you have a misunderstanding there: far less people program today in
C rather than Java or C#. About just those poor souls coding Unix
infrastructure... :P
>> Being not as intelligent as truly intelligent people is not the same
>> as being stupid. Endlessly pestering such bright people over
>> reasonably basic stuff you still don't understand... well, that's
>> stupid. ;)
>
> ...and when nemesis says I'm stupid, I really *don't* care. :-P
Read again.
Post a reply to this message
|
|