Darren New wrote:
> Patrick Elliott wrote:
>> Ah, well. The interface is, in some ways, just as jarring as the 
>> documentation, so, its a good match. ;) lol
> 
> I'm finding that the interface is, after a few days, merely annoying 
> rather than difficult. Everything seems to be in the menus somewhere (at 
> least to the level of expertise I have), the commands you use a lot you 
> just learn, etc. It seems like the kind of interface that if you worked 
> with it for a week or two you'd get pretty good at it.
> 
> Not unlike vi or emacs, really.

Exactly.  Blender feels to me closer to vi than anything else.  You just 
press regular keys and contextual commands are issued.

> I was just kind of bemused at someone implementing a feature for a 
> program as big and complex and public as Blender, and getting it checked 
> into the official version, with apparently no documentation at all about 
> what the feature is actually supposed to accomplish. It seems very 
> unprofessional for such a professional-level program.

Is it source code documentation for other programmers -- intending on 
contributing with Blender?  Blender's official user-level documentation 
is a wiki so it may simply not have catched up with source modifications.

Post a reply to this message