|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
nemesis <nam### [at] gmail com> wrote:
> Warp escreveu:
> > nemesis <nam### [at] gmail com> wrote:
> >> Not that. I have no problem calling ADTs objects or parametrized
> >> regions of code subroutines, functions, procedures, methods or whatever,
> >> as long as it's not within a OO framework. I like functional
> >> programming fluidity and lack of bureaucracy.
> >
> > Well, I usually prefer encapsulation and abstraction over fancy
> > one-liners.
> encapsulation and abstraction are conserved, thanks. :)
So you take what's great about OOP, rename it, and then say you hate OOP
and that it sucks, and that your own version is so much better.
--
- Warp
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |