nemesis <nam### [at] gmailcom> wrote:
> Warp escreveu:
> > nemesis <nam### [at] gmailcom> wrote:
> >> Not that.  I have no problem calling ADTs objects or parametrized 
> >> regions of code subroutines, functions, procedures, methods or whatever, 
> >> as long as it's not within a OO framework.  I like functional 
> >> programming fluidity and lack of bureaucracy.
> > 
> >   Well, I usually prefer encapsulation and abstraction over fancy
> > one-liners.

> encapsulation and abstraction are conserved, thanks. :)

  So you take what's great about OOP, rename it, and then say you hate OOP
and that it sucks, and that your own version is so much better.

-- 
                                                          - Warp

Post a reply to this message