|
 |
somebody wrote:
> "Darren New" <dne### [at] san rr com> wrote in message
> news:4983bdac@news.povray.org...
>> somebody wrote:
>>> Don't assume. You want to release code mixed with GPL code,
>
>> No, I don't! That's exactly what the article is talking about!
>
> Doesn't matter, software that functions together is a block.
There's no such thing as "block" in copyright law. Clearly, all the movies
showing in the same movie theatre are functioning together "in a block", so
of course they all have to come from the same movie studio, right?
> Would GM allow a car dealership to put in, say, Toyota parts into
> their cars and sell it as a whole?
They don't enforce that with copyrights.
> If a piece of software depends on another to function as a
> package, demanding that the licenses be compatible makes sense to me.
Sure. But you can't enforce that with copyrights.
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
"Ouch ouch ouch!"
"What's wrong? Noodles too hot?"
"No, I have Chopstick Tunnel Syndrome."
Post a reply to this message
|
 |