Darren New wrote:
> Or, in other words, "We're number one, why try harder?"
> 
Yep. Which is why people get irritated.

>> instead of being asked in the first place,
> 
> The sort of stuff you were talking about changing above, it *does* ask 
> you in the first place, if you get the version of the installer that you 
> use for things installed dozens of times instead of once. I.e., if 
> you're actually working like you administer enough computers that 
> changing them one at a time is problematic, you use the installer that 
> asks you that stuff up front.
> 
Uh.. Where would this installer be? Oh, right... probably on the 
"corporate" multi-license version that most of us don't have access to... ;)

 > Errrr... \windows\prefetch is there? You didn't notice?  You never
 > looked at the add/remove programs window and noticed it told you how
 > often you used the program?
 >
 > "I never noticed it" isn't the same as "it isn't there."
 >

Still doesn't imply that the defragger is "aware" of that data and uses 
it. It didn't for a "long" time, much as Paint was "stuck" in 256 mode 
until XP, and not(e)pad was stuck with a 32k limit until the same. So, 
maybe they made them better in XP and Vista. Good for them, its about 
fracking time!! lol

-- 
void main () {
   If Schrödingers_cat is alive or version > 98 {
     if version = "Vista" {
       call slow_by_half();
       call DRM_everything();
     }
     call functional_code();
   }
   else
     call crash_windows();
}

<A HREF='http://www.daz3d.com/index.php?refid=16130551'>Get 3D Models, 
3D Content, and 3D Software at DAZ3D!</A>

Post a reply to this message