Darren New wrote:
> I don't think this is going to do what I think they think it's going to do.

Or one more thought ... What if I use the gcc front-end, a plug-in that 
saves the intermediate code to disk, and then I compile that intermediate 
code down to something that doesn't use gcc libraries? (Java bytecodes, .NET 
IL, or machine code that I generate completely within the plug-in...)

Doesn't sound like they're managing to cover everything it sounds like they 
think they're trying to cover. :-)

-- 
   Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
   "Ouch ouch ouch!"
   "What's wrong? Noodles too hot?"
   "No, I have Chopstick Tunnel Syndrome."

Post a reply to this message