|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Darren New wrote:
>>
>> Home, yeah. But.. You don't want to do this "before" you install some
>> things, or they break (and yeah, yeah, they don't follow spec, blah,
>> blah.. But geeze...), and somehow I doubt that it moved "everything",
>> not just the documents.
>
Since 2k Windows has supported mounting partitions to directories. It
doesn't come up on the normal installation, but wouldn't it be possible
to just mount another partition to C:\Documents and settings or
C:\Users? Of course using both styles makes it more complicated to
think, but I don't see why it wouldn't work just like mounting another
partition to /home in Linux.
> They don't optimize program access? It's been doing that since like Win
> 3.1 or so. What's "the other" you're talking about?
Running defragger on Windows 3.1 sounds somewhat frightening.
Multitasking still sucked on Win3.1 (it existed, but it was veeeery slow
comparing to another implementations) and it certainly locked amount of
files while running. Running the defragger from DOS sounds more familiar
and sane.
-Aero
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |