Darren New wrote:
> Invisible wrote:
>> unecessarily complicated, 
> 
> That kind of depends on whether you need the complicated bits, don't you 
> think? The opposite of "unnecessarily complicated" is "lacking features."

You know, I *was* going to construct a long and detailed reply carefully 
explaining why you're wrong and I'm right. But you know what? I've just 
got home from another exhilerating dance class, and I don't actually 
*care* any more. I know I'm right, and if you don't... well, right now, 
I'm not fussed. I'm going to go have a nice relaxing shower! :-D

-- 
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*

Post a reply to this message