POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.off-topic : Random: FFT, Organ, Blahblah.. : Re: Random: FFT, Organ, Blahblah.. Server Time
6 Sep 2024 07:16:20 EDT (-0400)
  Re: Random: FFT, Organ, Blahblah..  
From: Mike Raiford
Date: 30 Jan 2009 11:06:24
Message: <49832580$1@news.povray.org>
Invisible wrote:

> 
> Well for a start I'd need the hated .NET runtime first... :-P
> 

Whats the difference between .NET and, say, JRE? Why so against the .NET 
framework?

>>
>> So, combining square waves?
> 
> Well, I wrote a program that would sum sinewaves together in various 
> ways to produce different waveforms. It sounded a bit like a filter 
> sweep. (Back when I was 12, I didn't know how to perform a *real* filter 
> sweep!)
> 

of course... For some reason I pictured you generating the sounds 
through the PC speaker, recording them recombining them.

> 
> Er, no... Actually it's a basic consequence of physics, and that's why 
> the human auditory system is turned to detect it. ;-)
> 

What amazes me is how the ear detects sounds. It literally works in the 
frequency domain. :)

> As an aside: You can use waveshaping to add new *higher* frequency 
> components, but never *lower* frequency ones.
> 

Right.


>> It should be possible to generate a Fourier series by using an iFFT to 
>> get a band limited saw/square/triangle, no?
> 
> Yes.
> 
>> ... rather than iteratively combine the waveforms (which takes forever 
> 
> Depends how many waves you want, at what sampling frequency. But yes, at 
> some point FFT becomes faster.

I wonder in this case. I'll have to grab the source again and look at 
how it was done.

-- 
~Mike


Post a reply to this message

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.