|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
"Invisible" <voi### [at] dev null> wrote in message
news:497d8f76$1@news.povray.org...
> >> With a new GTX 260 you'd be laughing.
>>
>> Oh, I missed that it was a GTX. Yep, should play fine.
>
> *All* of the GPUs in the 200-series are designated "GTX". (I don't know
> why... Perhaps something to do with nVidia's new naming scheme?)
Hmm, you're right, my bad.
>
> So anyway, I asked Wikipedia:
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_Nvidia_graphics_processing_units
>
> Comparing your high-end 6-series to my low-end 200-series, we have:
>
> | GeForce 6600GT | GeForce GTX 260
> Gigapixels / second | 2.000 | 16.128
> Gigatexels / second | 4.000 | 36.864
> Gigabytes / second | 16.000 | 111.900
>
> The GeForce GTX 260 also generates approximately 715 gigaFLOPS peak
> processing power (single-precision only).
<sniff> Don't do that to me. I'm sad now... <sniff> :/
>
> Given that you claim your 6600GT "handles" Crysis, and all of the
> performance data I can actually obtain for both cards gives the GTX260 has
> roughly ten times "better", in theory the GTX260 should eat it up...
>
> We shall see!
You won't be disappointed! :)
When will you get the 260? Today?
~Steve~
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |