Chambers <ben### [at] pacificwebguycom> wrote:
> Actually, it can't, but that's irrelevant.

> You said:
> "In other words, you simply can write the same thing with a slightly
> different syntax, but otherwise there's no difference. I really fail to
> see the usefulness of this."

> In other words, you see no usefulness in having syntactic sugar.  I
> think it's useful.

  No. What I said was that I don't see usefulness IN THIS CASE. The
difference is practically nonexistent. It's only in reordering of
names.

-- 
                                                          - Warp

Post a reply to this message