|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Warp wrote:
> Darren New <dne### [at] san rr com> wrote:
>> You'd wind up changing the course of the black hole much less than you'd
>> change the course of your spaceship, is all.
>
> The black hole would have to be moving towards the general direction
> of Earth, in that case.
I don't have the math to be sure that's true. Wouldn't it be possible to
make it moving away less quickly?
I mean, certainly if there's a solid object moving away from you, you can
land on it and jump off and go up. Stand on a trampoline going 1 MPH
downwards - can you jump up?
You might be right, tho, if there's no physical contact, but as I say I
don't want to learn the math to figure it out. :-)
> But you get tons of other problems, as I described in my post. :P
Yah. I posted before I read that, methinks.
> As very massive objects, and ones usually formed from collapsing stars
> (the collapse leaving behind tons of stuff), I think it would be rather
> difficult to find "naked" black holes, without the accompanying stuff.
Unless you manufactured it yourself, yes. :-)
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
"Ouch ouch ouch!"
"What's wrong? Noodles too hot?"
"No, I have Chopstick Tunnel Syndrome."
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |