On 18-Jan-09 6:34, nemesis wrote:
> Darren New <dne### [at] sanrrcom> wrote:
>> andrel wrote:
>>> On 17-Jan-09 19:58, Darren New wrote:
>>>> John VanSickle wrote:
>>>>> And there is no observation, or combination of observations, which is
>>>>> inconsistent with the existence of God, nor can there ever be such.
>>>> First, define God.
>>> Something outside space and time that can not interact with our
>>> universe. ;)
>> I'm happy with that definition. In that case, there's neither reason to
>> believe in it or disbelieve in it. There's certainly no reason to worship
>> it, pray to it, or tell others what it wants you to do.
> 
> But seemingly there are lots of reasons to start flamewars about it. :)
> 
> He's also The guy who defined man and woman. ;)

And there is silly old me that still claims that there is no consistent 
definition of man and woman. Apparently I have to yield to a higher power.

Post a reply to this message