andrel wrote:
> One of the reasons why things are a bit changing is that it used to be 
> so that the publisher did a final correction, made nice illustrations 
> and did the final layout.

Well, that and the peer review. But the peer review was usually done by 
unpaid peers, so it comes to close to the same thing. The journal was really 
providing reputation more than anything. Reputation is something that nobody 
can monopolise, tho.

-- 
   Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
   Why is there a chainsaw in DOOM?
   There aren't any trees on Mars.

Post a reply to this message