|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Tim Cook wrote:
> At least WordPerfect had this additional feature called Grammatik that'd
> check the grammar of your document in addition to spelling, and that
> would pick up errors like that (and whether you're using passive or
> active voice, et cetera).
Word has a "grammer check" feature that tells you almost every sentence
is structured wrong and suggests that you rephrase it to sound like
Master Yoda. (E.g., change "this is going to be a problem" to "a problem
to be this is".) I never use that feature. ;-)
In short, nothing I've seen reliably replaces a human proof-reader.
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |