Tim Cook wrote:
> At least WordPerfect had this additional feature called Grammatik that'd 
> check the grammar of your document in addition to spelling, and that 
> would pick up errors like that (and whether you're using passive or 
> active voice, et cetera).

Word has a "grammer check" feature that tells you almost every sentence 
is structured wrong and suggests that you rephrase it to sound like 
Master Yoda. (E.g., change "this is going to be a problem" to "a problem 
to be this is".) I never use that feature. ;-)

In short, nothing I've seen reliably replaces a human proof-reader.

Post a reply to this message