|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Would jitter do the same? It seems focal blur is:
1. relatively expensive
2. introduces an artifact, as it's depth-dependent
Jaime Vives Piqueres wrote:
> A quick note about something I just discovered...
>
> When using two-pass radiosity, if you use a little focal blur during the
> first pass (just a few blur samples is enough), the you can scale up the
> render size on the second pass without suffering the typical artefacts
> (and you don't need to use focal blur on the final pass).
>
> I've used this trick successfully with the first pass at 320x240 and
> the second at 1024x768. So, for the first pass I'm now using that in the
> camera:
>
> aperture .01 blur_samples 7 focal_point <,,>
>
> Regards,
>
> --
> Jaime
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |