On Mon, 05 Jan 2009 15:54:14 -0800, Darren New wrote:

> Jim Henderson wrote:
>> It's also probably a bit more involved than XEN is.
> 
> I'm not sure. I used it only vaguely. Note that the "VM" part means
> "virtual machine", and "CMS" was the single-user OS that ran under it
> without change, so I think the differences between that and XEN are
> probably pretty monor.

Maybe, I'd have to talk to someone who knows VM/CMS better.  Used to be a 
guy I worked with who thought of VMware in those terms.

Jim

Post a reply to this message