Patrick Elliott <sel### [at] npgcablecom> wrote:
> Yeah. His definition would make Apple DOS and Prodos "not operating 
> systems", because it was possible, in both, to talk directly to Apple 
> hardware

  You don't even know what "my" definition is (which isn't mine, as I have
said several times). You just assume from what Darren seems to assume.

-- 
                                                          - Warp

Post a reply to this message