On 23-Dec-08 20:19, Chambers wrote:
> (By the way, one of the reasons I enjoy discoursing with people in this
> forum is because they challenge me to really be smart about my ideas)
> 
>  
> 
> OK, after Darren's argument that both bad and good people have been
> censored in the past, can we at least agree that Censorship makes sense
> when someone is advocating infringing on the rights, freedoms, liberties
> and property of others, but that those rights do NOT include a "right to
> not be offended?"
> 
no

Post a reply to this message