|
|
Darren New wrote:
> Bill Pragnell wrote:
>> Haha, I prefer to see films in the big screens, but I also prefer it
>> if the rest of the audience are dead quiet, or, if I can possibly
>> manage it, absent. I usually find other people far distracting from
>> the film.
>
> I went to see a vampire movie in the middle of the afternoon on a
> thursday once. It was the least memorable movie I ever saw, because
> there were 3 others in the audience.
I like to focus on a movie. If the guy behind me is nattering on his
phone and the guy in front is wrestling with a plastic bag, well, it
really grinds my gears!
> On the other hand, I saw "The Grudge" and there were dozens of teens
> down near the front who'd obviously seen it several times already and
> were raising hell, and it was still rather disturbing. :-)
I've not seen the Grudge, but from what I've heard I think I'd be quite
thankful of the extra noise in that particular case. In fact, I think
horror movies nullify my previous claim - when I saw 'Identity' I was
the only person in the screen and it scared the sh*t out of me!
> And of course, Rocky Horror Picture Show wouldn't be the same without
> the audience.
Well, that's different! Or sing-a-long Sound Of Music for that matter
(not that I'm likely to rush into that either)
> But I find commedies greatly enhanced by having an audience, which is
> why people put in fake soundtracks on the ones you watch by yourself at
> home.
Fair enough. I don't usually bother with pure comedies in the cinema,
they lose nothing on a small screen and I'm more often disappointed by
them these days. I'd rather be disappointed by big-budget eye candy
instead! (SWII:AOTC anyone?)
Yes, I think you're right actually, it depends on the movie. If it's a
serious drama/thriller I'd prefer my co-viewers to keep it down, but I'm
not that bothered otherwise. I think the few truly bad experiences jade
my attitude a little!
Post a reply to this message
|
|