Warp wrote:
> std::vector<hgeSprite> tile;
> 
> tile.reserve(8*8);
> for(...)
>   for(...)
>     tile.push_back(hgeSprite(...));

Not that I'd recommend micro-optimization over readability, but isn't this 
going to be more inefficient than the other way? Doesn't this allocate a 
sprite on the stack, pass it to tile.push_back(), which then has to copy it 
to dynamically allocated memory anyway?

-- 
   Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
   The NFL should go international. I'd pay to
   see the Detroit Lions vs the Roman Catholics.

Post a reply to this message