Orchid XP v8 wrote:
> Tom Austin wrote:
> 
>> It sounds like you are getting / are very involved with Haskell and 
>> know  at least more than me about its inner workings.
>>
>> FWIW Why not start writing some of the things that you just mentioned 
>> down and make them available.
>>
>> You could provide a web site with simple articles explaining some of 
>> these things.
>>
>> You could turn it into a <gasp> published book </gasp>.
> 
> I have written one or two small things...
> 
> http://blog.orphi.me.uk/archives/332
> http://blog.orphi.me.uk/archives/49
> http://blog.orphi.me.uk/archives/40
> 
> http://blog.orphi.me.uk/archives/37
> http://blog.orphi.me.uk/archives/38
> http://blog.orphi.me.uk/archives/39
> 
> http://blog.orphi.me.uk/archives/34
> http://blog.orphi.me.uk/archives/32
> 
> ....just the odd item. I stopped when I realised that nobody ever reads 
> any of this stuff, because I am the only human alive who gives a **** 
> about Haskell.
> 

U assume too much, I'm another fan, and congratz on the blog, one of the 
coolest I've ever seen that also will help me when i decide to do as 
complicated as those.

Post a reply to this message