|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Orchid XP v8 escreveu:
>> Why would my o operator not be a one-liner?
>
> Because it's defined as four (very wide) lines? :-P
By how many lines is $ defined by?
Abstract it away, man! We're here today because we stand in the
shoulders of giants, don't forget that...
> In Lisp, you
> cannot avoid endless brackets, because notionally the *entire source
> code* as a single expression. :-P
Yes, code is data in Lisp. Ain't that sweet? :)
> Heh, right. One question: is it statically-typed?
No. Like I said, perfect. :)
> Haskell is *loaded* with functions that do the same or similar things.
> It's about how you want to think about your problem.
I prefer to design my own DSLs and have a minimalist general-purpose
language with few constructs that don't get in the way nor confuse me
with conflicting semantics.
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |