Warp wrote:
>   Why do you always have to have such a condescending tone when talking
> about linux?

The only "condescending" bit was the comment about fragmented files. That 
probably came about because I'd just read a big long flame-war about why 
Linux doesn't fragment files and Windows sucks and yadda yadda.

I guess it's because much of the time I run across these things, it's 
following links from "MS is stupid and evil" rants.

>   If linux does not support something, it's worth of mockery. 

I usually don't mock what Linux doesn't support. Regret it, maybe, but not 
mock it. I mock all the folks who say that Linux not supporting something 
means you shouldn't need it.

> If people
> actually go and implement something new for linux, it's also worth of
> mockery. 

It's not mockery here.  I thought folks might be interested in the 
developments. Particularly since we just had a big discussion about the 
stuff like transactional file updates.

Actually, the biggest "mock" was making fun of MS for claiming everything 
they add to Windows is their own invention. ;-)  I *do* try to balance out 
my rants.

> Whatever they do, it's never right.

Yeah. Same with MS, really. :-)

-- 
   Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
   The NFL should go international. I'd pay to
   see the Detroit Lions vs the Roman Catholics.

Post a reply to this message