|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Warp wrote:
> Why do you always have to have such a condescending tone when talking
> about linux?
The only "condescending" bit was the comment about fragmented files. That
probably came about because I'd just read a big long flame-war about why
Linux doesn't fragment files and Windows sucks and yadda yadda.
I guess it's because much of the time I run across these things, it's
following links from "MS is stupid and evil" rants.
> If linux does not support something, it's worth of mockery.
I usually don't mock what Linux doesn't support. Regret it, maybe, but not
mock it. I mock all the folks who say that Linux not supporting something
means you shouldn't need it.
> If people
> actually go and implement something new for linux, it's also worth of
> mockery.
It's not mockery here. I thought folks might be interested in the
developments. Particularly since we just had a big discussion about the
stuff like transactional file updates.
Actually, the biggest "mock" was making fun of MS for claiming everything
they add to Windows is their own invention. ;-) I *do* try to balance out
my rants.
> Whatever they do, it's never right.
Yeah. Same with MS, really. :-)
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
The NFL should go international. I'd pay to
see the Detroit Lions vs the Roman Catholics.
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |