On 06-Dec-08 19:52, Darren New wrote:
> andrel wrote:
>> There is atm not much more to learn as basic skills that won't fit in 
>> 12 or so. 
> 
> And, 100 years ago, there wasn't much more to learn as basic skills that 
> won't fit in 4 or 5 years. 

I would think that often there was. As long as we are talking about 
craftsman and such. The timing of brain development has not much changed 
in these times.

> And I'm pretty sure the chinese emperors and 
> such got more training than 12 years or so.

yes, pretty sure. but that was probably not only basic skills.

Post a reply to this message