|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Darren New wrote:
> Invisible wrote:
>> I don't know if you know this already, but...
>
> This is exactly the sort of random s__t you say off the cuff that
> convinces me you're a heck of a lot smarter than than you think you are.
> I'm thinking "sinc filter? Is that a typo?" and here you're explaining
> it, providing code to calculate, and describing how and why the
> alternatives don't work. As if "well, just in passing, in case you
> didn't know about this...."
A trivial matter of Wikipedia, my friend:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sinc_function
It's all there, and more besides. When you're as bored as me, you find
these things out.
I love the way that if you say something with enough conviction, people
will *assume* that you know what you're on about, and that what you say
is correct. ;-) In the case of Mike's problem, I was merely taking
educated guesses and passing them off as fact. Successfully, by the look
of it.
> Damn, you need to apply to smarter jobs. :-)
"When you're as bored as me" would seem to suggest that, yes.
I find myself questioning whether "smarter jobs" actually exist. I mean,
I guess *somebody* must design DSP algorithms for a living... but it
doesn't sound like a very large field.
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |