> Well, there were already constitutional challenges based on the fact that 
> the camera can't take the witness stand, for example. How are you supposed 
> to argue you weren't speeding if the police won't even tell you where they 
> caught you speeding?

Of course they should tell you where you were caught, but there's no reason 
to keep the cameras in the same place.

Actually in the UK they had almost this method, because I think 80-90% of 
the camera housings are actually empty inside.  A pretty good idea so long 
as they put the camera housings near dangerous areas (and not just on a big 
empty wide stretch with a ridiculously low limit).  Naturally they move 
around the actual cameras, so you're never sure which ones are actually 
working or not.

Post a reply to this message