Chambers wrote:
>> even less. It's like Windows NT already did most of what you want an
> OS
> 
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Features_new_to_Windows_Vista
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technical_features_new_to_Windows_Vista
> 
> A lot of the stuff is under the hood; that is, it just does things
> better, even though users won't necessarily notice the difference.

That's why they added the eye candy. If they had only changed that whole
stuff under the hood, home users wouldn't see any reason to upgrade.

Post a reply to this message