Darren New wrote:
> And a 6000 page specification isn't unreasonable for something like
> this, either. The ODF specification isn't complete either, unless you
> include the source code for OpenOffice.org as part of it. Is anyone
> *really* going to implement a competitor to OpenOffice.org that doesn't
> do anything not already in that standard?
Ask me later this month...
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|