Darren New wrote:

> And a 6000 page specification isn't unreasonable for something like 
> this, either. The ODF specification isn't complete either, unless you 
> include the source code for OpenOffice.org as part of it.  Is anyone 
> *really* going to implement a competitor to OpenOffice.org that doesn't 
> do anything not already in that standard?

Ask me later this month...

-- 
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*

Post a reply to this message