Invisible <voi### [at] devnull> wrote:
> http://practical-tech.com/business/iso-approves-open-xml/

  Did they even fix the completely standard-breaking wording of that
"standard", along the lines of "render this paragraph in the same way
as Word95 does it" (without specifying *how* exactly Word95 does it)?

  If they didn't, I really can't understand how the standardization
committee can approve of a standard which doesn't actually specify
exactly what it is standardizing.

-- 
                                                          - Warp

Post a reply to this message