Cousin Ricky wrote:
> Darren New <dne### [at] sanrrcom> wrote:
>> Cousin Ricky wrote:
>>> 1) Natural effects tend to leave evidence that is more tangible than lens
>>> flares, overexposed camera straps, and imprints on the reporter's central
>>> nervous system.
>> Some do, some don't. :-)  Look at the long history of things we didn't
>> know about until we got the right measuring instruments. Do you think
>> the placebo effect is supernatural too? :-)
> 
> Effects that are supernatural remain so until proven otherwise.  Or I think
> that's how it goes.

I can't imagine they're actually supernatural if they're *actually* 
effects. :-) I mean, if there's actual effects, it would have to be 
natural, wouldn't it?  Indeed, does the word "supernatural" even make sense?

-- 
Darren New / San Diego, CA, USA (PST)

Post a reply to this message