Darren New wrote:
> Patrick Elliott wrote:
>> Ah, yeah. Your version was.. vague enough to kind of imply, in the 
>> minds of some people, the whole "ghosts are like a recording of a 
>> person, so since the person didn't think about their guts, their ghost 
>> won't show them." 
> 
> That's what I intended, without attempting to imply I believed it. :-)
> 
>  > One has to be real careful, when talking about the supposed
>> supernatural, not to lend accidental credence to what is non-credible. ;)
> 
> What makes you think the effect is supernatural?
> 

Umm. I don't. The term is **completely** meaningless, in that if 
something has any effect at all on the world, it "becomes" natural, even 
if its only on the person's nervous system. I said **supposed** there. 
Its the term the believers in it like to use, because they have this 
logic short circuit in which they think the "mind" and somehow sense, 
are somehow separate from the physical world, therefor its possible for 
some "other" world to muck with their perceptions, while having no 
effect on the real world. The irony being, they then use physical 
devices to run around "looking for" the damn things.. lol Which is it 
people? Either you can measure it, and their for its "material" or you 
can't, so it isn't. You can't have it both ways. ;)

Seriously though, would you prefer "alleged supernatural", since you 
seem to want to make a court case out of it? jk ;)

-- 
void main () {

     if version = "Vista" {
       call slow_by_half();
       call DRM_everything();
     }
     call functional_code();
   }
   else
     call crash_windows();
}

<A HREF='http://www.daz3d.com/index.php?refid=16130551'>Get 3D Models, 
3D Content, and 3D Software at DAZ3D!</A>

Post a reply to this message