|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Patrick Elliott wrote:
> Ah, yeah. Your version was.. vague enough to kind of imply, in the minds
> of some people, the whole "ghosts are like a recording of a person, so
> since the person didn't think about their guts, their ghost won't show
> them."
That's what I intended, without attempting to imply I believed it. :-)
> One has to be real careful, when talking about the supposed
> supernatural, not to lend accidental credence to what is non-credible. ;)
What makes you think the effect is supernatural?
--
Darren New / San Diego, CA, USA (PST)
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |