Patrick Elliott wrote:
> Ah, yeah. Your version was.. vague enough to kind of imply, in the minds 
> of some people, the whole "ghosts are like a recording of a person, so 
> since the person didn't think about their guts, their ghost won't show 
> them." 

That's what I intended, without attempting to imply I believed it. :-)

 > One has to be real careful, when talking about the supposed
> supernatural, not to lend accidental credence to what is non-credible. ;)

What makes you think the effect is supernatural?

-- 
Darren New / San Diego, CA, USA (PST)

Post a reply to this message