|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
>> All of which says only that you can possibly recover scattered
>> fragments from say 5% of the animal's DNA? But, its **still** way more
>> than thought possible, and enough to make "some" comparisons.
>
> Plus, you have millions of copies of the DNA, and you can take
> independent pieces of it and put them in the right order. Like having
> 100 copies of a book, each with pages missing, and putting together one
> good copy.
I'm sorry - I thought foscils were "rare"? ;-)
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |