Patrick Elliott wrote:
> All of which says only that you can possibly recover scattered fragments 
> from say 5% of the animal's DNA? But, its **still** way more than 
> thought possible, and enough to make "some" comparisons.

Plus, you have millions of copies of the DNA, and you can take 
independent pieces of it and put them in the right order. Like having 
100 copies of a book, each with pages missing, and putting together one 
good copy.


-- 
Darren New / San Diego, CA, USA (PST)

Post a reply to this message