Orchid XP v8 <voi### [at] devnull> wrote:
> At lower bitrates, the ridiculously-named codec "H.264" seems to look 
> slightly better than Xvid, which looks a bit better than DivX, which 
> looks quite a bit better than MPEG1.

  They will look better at lower bitrates if you use multipass encoding.

> I am not, however, seeing the reputed "massive" difference in image 
> quality.

  Not in image quality. In quality/size ratio. Try lowering the bitrate
for all the codecs (trying to keep all the resulting file sizes about
the same) and until you start seeing significant differences.

-- 
                                                          - Warp

Post a reply to this message