On Wed, 15 Oct 2008 14:55:07 -0300, Nicolas Alvarez wrote:

> Jim Henderson wrote:
>> Last time I was over there, I remember commenting on it talking to a
>> friend as I was driving his car (first time out, always good to drive
>> with someone who actually knows - and he had a vested interest, since
>> it was his car), and his comment was that it came down to a cost issue
>> - replacing perfectly good signs with other perfectly good signs wasn't
>> seen as cost-effective.
>> 
>> 
> Some vandal should destroy the current signs then :)

Get on that, will ya? ;-)

Jim

Post a reply to this message