|
|
Tim Cook <z99### [at] gmailcom> wrote:
> Now, as an obsessive image hoarder, I a) understand that it'll take them a
> while to sift through over 200,000 images and over a month's worth of video,
> no matter how neatly organized and b) worry that, since I sometimes
> batch-downloaded from newsgroups and image boards without necessarily
> actually viewing them all, might end up having something problematic.
Especially given that the *exact* same image can be completely normal and
legal when it's a photograph in a family album, but illegal and sick when
it's a jpeg in the computer of a lonely man.
I would be surprised if the laws of any country made that kind of
distinction, but who cares? At least not law enforcement.
--
- Warp
Post a reply to this message
|
|