> There's no "for" but you can use "while" for the same purpose.  

Although it would be nice to have a for loop as well. I understand
the concept of semantic sugar, but there must be a reason why every 
programming language in popular use has such a construct. And in
SDL in particular I think most loops I've ever seen were actually
counter-based loops (placing objects, subdivide angles, arrays).

Post a reply to this message