Orchid XP v8 <voi### [at] devnull> wrote:
> What I was really interested to know is whether trying to construct a 
> set without a comparison operator yields a compile-time error, a runtime 
> error, or simply undefined behaviour.

  We are talking about templates here. Everything happens at compile
time. :)

  (Although the error message will probably be quite obfuscated. With
the next C++ standard compilers will have means to directly say "your
type has no operator< but one is required".)

-- 
                                                          - Warp

Post a reply to this message