|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
somebody wrote:
>>> That's easy: $100,000 billion.
>
>>> And that's a very low figure when you think about it. Even if it only
> saves
>>> 10 lives (gross, gross underestimate), I'm saying that the value of one
>>> human's life to me is about the same as satisfying the curiousity of
> about
>>> 1000 or so physicists. If you were faced with such a dilemma and were
> given
>>> a two buttons, which one would *you* push?
>
>> So put another way, your answer is essentially "Never".
>
> Not quite what I said. That's a pessimist admission on your part that we
Well, yes. I do have trouble seeing humanity spending $100 trillion per
year on medical research, in today's Dollars. I may even be opposed to
it, because I'm sure it'll imply a lot of other things being neglected.
In case you missed it, my original question was with relation to today's
dollar and today's resources.
--
Ground yourself, THEN hug your motherboard!
/\ /\ /\ /
/ \/ \ u e e n / \/ a w a z
>>>>>>mue### [at] nawaz org<<<<<<
anl
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |