Warp wrote:
> Invisible <voi### [at] devnull> wrote:
>> Copy...constructor...? x_x
> 
>   Usually you don't need copy constructors unless you have pointers as
> member variables of your class and you explicitly allocate memory to
> them with 'new'. But we don't do that, do we? ;)

Heh. I get the impression that most of the stuff I'm reading about now 
is stuff that "you won't normally need". ;-)

(E.g., apparently you can overload the "->" operator... GAH! >_< OK, I 
am *so* not trying that out!)


Anyway, the main reason I haven't written a Third C++ Program yet is 
that I'm trying to think of something I actually want to write that's 
implementable without automatic memory management...

Post a reply to this message