somebody wrote:
> That's the most absurd, as well as most interesting thing I've read in a
> while, so I'd like to understand this line of thought better. Do you not
> care about your own existance? Alternatively, how do you plan on enjoying or
> getting satisfaction from the fruits of hundereds of years long investment?

	I care quite a bit about my own existence. That's why I invest in it. 
Is it hard for you to understand that folks don't need to invest every 
single penny to their own existence? That they might actually spend a 
portion elsewhere?

	I can see you did not bother answering how much you'd like to see 
medical research get before you're willing to be OK with spending $10 
billion for the LHC.

	The more I look at your statements in this thread, the more I suspect 
that your concern is not medical research. It's that you feel $10 
billion shouldn't be spent on this regardless of what is spent 
elsewhere, and that the appeal to cancer and aging research was just a 
guise to provide legitimacy.
	
-- 
AAAAA - American Association Against Acronym Abuse


                     /\  /\               /\  /
                    /  \/  \ u e e n     /  \/  a w a z
                        >>>>>>mue### [at] nawazorg<<<<<<
                                    anl

Post a reply to this message