somebody wrote:
> Do you really believe top quark will ever have a practical application in
> the next, say, 100 years?

	You keep asking this, so I'll respond with a statement that I think 
most here agree with:

	"I have no reason to believe that finding the top quark will have no 
practical applications, and thus won't take it as an assumption."

	Besides, why limit to 100 years? What if it provides benefits 300 years 
from now?
	

-- 
AAAAA - American Association Against Acronym Abuse


                     /\  /\               /\  /
                    /  \/  \ u e e n     /  \/  a w a z
                        >>>>>>mue### [at] nawazorg<<<<<<
                                    anl

Post a reply to this message